Researching the politics of development

Publications

Share

When a ‘ruling alliance’ and public sector governance meet: Managing for performance in South African basic education


Working paper 60

Download pdf

Robert Cameron and Vinothan Naidoo

Abstract

This paper is one of a series of ESID studies that explore the extent to which the

performance of schools can be explained as an outcome of the interactions between,

on the one hand, the prevailing political dynamics and, on the other, the

characteristics of the prevailing institutional arrangements. The focus of this paper is

on the national performance tools in South Africa. When one looks at the

arrangements that have been put in place for managing public sector performance

since 1994 – across the public service as a whole and specifically within the

education sector – they are enormously impressive. But in general these efforts did

not translate into strong performance.

This paper explores the hypothesis that the answer to this puzzle can be found in the

disconnect between, on the one hand, the technocratic orientation of the

performance management systems which were introduced and, on the other, a

political environment characterised by strong contestation over policy amongst

competing stakeholders in the education sector. It is proposed that policies for

managing performance in basic education could best be explained as the outcome of

a strategic interaction among three sets of actors – technocratically-oriented public

officials in the bureaucracy, teacher labour unions (especially SADTU, as the

dominant union), and the ANC in its dual role as the top level of the public sector

hierarchy and as the primus inter pares within the ‘ruling alliance’. In practice, the

political strength of organised labour resulted in national policies which, beneath their

surface, fell well short of the aspiration of robust performance management.